|
July 16th.,
2008
The Chávez-Uribe
Encounter
“I was struck cold when I heard the news”, stated Chávez
to the Information Ministers of the Non Aligned
countries who met at Margarita Island “to build a new
communication order that confronts the media hegemony of
Imperialism”. He said that while he was visiting a
Socialist city that he decided to found between Caracas
and the sea, a Colombian worker told him that 15 people
kidnapped by the Farc, amongst them Ingrid Betancourt,
had been rescued by a military command. He informed
that he had called Uribe to congratulate him, he
announced that they had agreed to “a meeting in
Caracas”, and he assured that he would greet him “ as a
brother”. The business cupola and opposition parties
scheduled interviews with the visitor at the Colombian
Embassy. The Foreign Affair Office, in agreement with
Bogotá, moved the seat of the meeting to the Pdvsa
premises in the Paraguaná Peninsula, some 500 kilometers
to the west of the capital. The journalists that
covered the event coincided in sensing distance, forced
smiles and a cold hand shake when both mandataries met
face to face. There were insistent calls from the
photographers to “give each other a hug”. There was a
lunch, a meeting of two long hours, without presence of
any third parties, as demanded by Uribe, and a joint
press conference. Uribe, with a subtle expression of
content, in brief terms and with a certain humor,
answered the questions of journalists, and Chávez, with
a stern face and circumlocutory help, he finally offered
the headlines for the news: we passed the page of being
distant from each other and we decided to re launch our
human and political relations. The Colombian Foreign
Affairs Office, in a press note, had pointed out ten
issues for the meeting. The Presidents made reference
to several, specially bilateral commerce and border
security, but they said goodbye “without much emotion”,
as noted by the journalists, without signing any
agreements nor any joint declarations. The Chancellors
will meet within two months to discuss pending
matters.
Analysts
make all kinds of speculations regarding what could have
been discussed, in absolute privacy. Chávez and Uribe.
Both agreed that Chávez did claim his suspension as
mediator without any previous indication, and Uribe, the
personal insults he was object of. It is logical to
suppose that in the two long hours of dialogue,
arguments and commitments to normalize bilateral
relations came up, without underestimating the content
of the Raúl Reyes computers and the documents regarding
the activity of the guerrilla men, including important
members of the Farc´s Secretariat, more on this side of
the border. The writer for a Caracas paper stated that
there was a game of mutual conveniences back in
Paraguaná, a good dose of hypocrisy and reciprocal
blackmail. “ I have the evidence of your support to the
Farc”, “I have the keys to bilateral commerce”. The
essential to Uribe was revealed by his Defense
Minister: “words must be translated into facts, and
they must not tolerate the presence of the Farc in their
territory”. Chávez´ reaction should be construed as a
reminder of commitments: “ We are going to turn the
page, but you must put Minister Santos in his place”.
The essential to Chávez was evidenced by his own self.
He would travel to Quito to convince Correa to make
peace with Bogotá. With a call to prudence to the
Ministers, Uribe confirmed his blessing so that he may
keep on playing the role of the great fixer of the
region.
CHÁVEZ
PRODIGALITY
Chávez
does not need consent from his neighbors to continue his
international project. The message to Uribe was sent
having 18 rulers of the region as his audience, present
in the Petrocaribe Summit. He obtained intense
applauses before the announcement of improving the
payment and financing conditions of the importations of
Venezuelan hydrocarbons, in order to compensate the
impact of the increase in the prices of oil. He asked
Leonel Fernández to become an associate in the Dominican
refinery and he offered him a space in the Orinoco
Strip. He was also very applauded when he announced a
financial fund by Venezuela for a food program in the
Petrocaribe countries. The announcements that go beyond
the region, those he made before the Non Aligned, when
he offered them Telesur (exclusively transmitted the
rescue of Clara Rojas and Consuelo González), Radio
Nacional de Venezuela and offered to finance Radio del
Sur, with a global reach, so that the Non Aligned
receive “true and reliable information” coming from
Caracas. Accompanied by Daniel Ortega, he was the main
character, in Ecuador, of a symbolic event of the
creation of the Petro Chemical and Refining Pacific
Complex, in Manta, which investment, as per Correa, may
reach US$ 10,000 Million and which will be operated
jointly by Petroecuador and Pdvsa, who is the owner of
49% of the shares. Pursuant to the Ecuadorian press,
Chávez met with Ortega and Correa to analyze the
“Colombia´s thorny issue”.
Bolivia is object of special attention given the
internal problems faced by the government. Its Minister
of Hydrocarbons encouraged the Summit to approve an
investment of US$ 883 Million in its Petroandina
project, comprised by YPFB and Pdvsa. Evo Morales, in a
speech before miners, explained that the resources
donated by Venezuela are received directly by the
Embassy at La Paz. “I told President Chávez that rather
than sending the money to the Nation´s General
Treasury, to send it to the Embassy and this way we
avoid paper work and loosing time”. According to the
Bolivian press, with these resources Morales is carrying
on the program “Bolivia changes, Evo complies”, an
assistance program for diverse sectors, specially for
farmers and the military, a program that he wishes be
successful to confront the August 10 recall. Chávez
munificence also has US poor people as receptors. A
communication from the Embassy at Washington informed
that additional to free heating for poor families in
various cities, PDVSA´s affiliate has launched a
program donating light bulbs that consume less energy to
low income families.
According to independent analysts, Chávez prodigality is
backfiring on him. The content of the Raúl Reyes
computers has made an effect, even if Uribe is keeping
such information as a pressure reserve. The regional
leadership does not go beyond Alba, even if no country
can reject promises of energetic cooperation, many far
from the productive and financial capacity of Pdvsa,
which is increasingly indebted and is turning to future
sales to resolve cash flow problems. Domestically,
opinion studies are not auspicious for him. One of his
critics, the writer Antonio Sánchez García, insists that
he must explain the work undergone with the US$ 750,000
Million that has been available to him during these 9
years. The argument has had an effect and the
opposition make a game of the figures in order to make
an inventory of all that he could have accomplished with
such fabulous resources. For a writer of El Universal,
Chávez is going to the regional elections with
candidates whom the population perceive as the ones
responsible of the problems that he faces. “It is of no
use to hide the figures regarding lack of security,
inflation or unemployment. The government policies have
ruined the poorest sectors”.
THE CHURCH SPEAKS AND THE REGIME
ANSWERS
“Christ was a socialist and his teachings inspire our
revolution, backed by the majority of the people. As
head of State, I have the authority to reject the
interference of the leaders that pretend to speak on
behalf of the Christian people”. These are Chávez
arguments every time that the Catholic Church expresses
its concerns and proposals regarding the national
reality. The Venezuelan Episcopal Conference, (CEV), in
its Ordinary Assembly, produced a document that,
notwithstanding its sobriety and prudence, it triggered
the wrath of the government. The Bishops state that
they are obliged to manifest that the insecurity “has
become the major concern for Venezuelans, and upon the
unleashed and uncontrolled violence, there appear to be
no solutions, either short or long term, given the lack
of public policies that guarantee social peace and the
right to life, and to top it all, kidnapping has summed
up in an alarming way”, a crime to which they call for a
frontal struggle. The Church offered itself as a space
to convoke all political, social, education and
religious forces to analyze the issue of insecurity and
jointly search for effective solutions. The Minister of
Interior Affairs alleges that the figures published
regarding insecurity and kidnapping respond to
conspiracy plans and their purpose is to destabilize the
revolutionary government.
The CEV pointed out as a threat to private education,
preventing that due to the elevated inflation figures,
the salary of the teachers be rightfully adjusted. They
warned that Catholic education institutions are in
danger of disappearing, upon denying the parents to
approve indispensable increases in the schools
tuitions. Upon the purpose of imposing a curricula
ideologically marked, it called for an open and
inclusive consultation, that respects the rights of
parents to chose the type of integral education they
desire for their kids, a right expressly consecrated in
the Constitution. As in past occasions, they called for
the civic exercise of the vote, and it made a call to
the candidates´ or political actors´ responsibility,
arguing that “in this electoral process, essential
values of democracy are at stake rather than merely
political positions”. For the CEV, the political
panorama is characterized by an unhealthy twitching ,
and in such scenery, the imposition of the slogan
“country, Socialism or death”, ethically reprovable an
unconstitutional, is an element that lightens
polarization. The whole document is a vehement call for
respect to human rights, amongst which it points out the
right of the citizens to chose and be chosen, and as an
element of essential reference, the right to life,
jeopardized by insecurity and violence. The voice of
those Catholics was also heard in the speech of
incorporation to the Academy of Political and Social
Sciences, of Luis Ugalde, the Rector of the Universidad
Católica Andrés Bello: “If Democracy is not able to
establish social justice, preserve liberty, plurality of
opinions and the autonomy of institutions, it is no
longer Democracy”.
Apart from the traditional insults against the
Institution and its representative figures, the answer
from the regime was to ratify the disqualification of
the candidates, who, as per the surveys, appear with the
most possibilities of being elected as Governors or
Mayors. Cardinal Urosa guided a liturgy at the
Universidad Central as an homage to student Douglas
Rojas, murdered by police officers repressing a
demonstration against such disqualifications. The
Student leaders manifested that the murder of Rojas and
the persecution they are object of oblige them to a
major commitment in the civic struggle for human rights
and respect to the Constitution.
|